Established in 2010

About MEPIELAN eBulletin

MEPIELAN E-Bulletin is a digital academic and practitioner newsletter of the MEPIELAN Centre, launched in 2010.ย  It features insight articles, reflective opinions, specially selected documents and cases, book reviews as well as news on thematic topics of direct interest of MEPIELAN Centre and on the activities and role of MEPIELAN Centre. Its content bridges theory and practice perspectives of relational international law, international environmental law and participatory governance , and international negotiating process, thus serving the primary goal of Centre: to develop an integrated, inter-disciplinary, relational, context-related and sustainably effective governance approach creating, protecting and advancing international common interest for the present and future generations. Providing a knowledge- and information-sharing platform and a scholarly forum, the Bulletin promotes innovative ideas and enlightened critical views, contributing to a broader scholarly debate on important issues of international common interest. The audience of the Bulletin includes academics, practitioners, researchers, university students, international lawyers, officials and personnel of international organizations and institutional arrangements, heads and personnel of national authorities at all levels (national, regional and local), and members of the civil society at large.

Editorial Feb 2012

February 1, 2012

Welcome to the first edition of MEPIELAN E-Bulletin in 2012.

We are gratified to see that the previous editions of 2010 and 2011 of the Bulletin have been so well received by many readers. According to the latest figures, there have been over 7.200 visits to the Bulletinโ€™s website from 139 countries worldwide. My gratitude and thanks go to all those who have been instrumental in the continuing success of this Bulletin.

I am pleased to report that there is a flourishing progress of the Bulletin at all levels. Its vision to be a dynamic forum for inter-disciplinary knowledge and discussion and an advocate, through insightful articles of current importance, of promoting and developing international common interest and its multifarious governance, is zestfully met with the increasing engagement of distinguished academic experts and scholars as well as promising young researchers. This edition features several new articles shedding light on hotly debated issues of international law and policy, environment and development. While continuing the unending flow of thematic news, this edition also presents a new international case of interest and it serves as a showcase for new books which are knowledge-advancing and theoretically-informed.

A Guest Article written byย Tullio Scovazzi, Professor of International Law, University of Milan-Bicocca, Italy, offers an authoritative and timely overview ofย  the nature and extent of Maritime Zones in the Mediterranean, illustrating the contextual peculiarities reflected in the patchwork of the present legal regimes of sui generis zones (fisheries zones, ecological zones) and of the established, or officially declared, exclusive economic zones. As he underlines, this situation is directly related to the more general present picture of the Mediterranean Sea: a semi-enclosed โ€œsea in transition towards a generalized exclusive economic zone regimeโ€ where, however, โ€œsome high seas areas still existโ€.

Three Insight Articles also feature this edition:
Nilufer Oral, Lecturer at Istanbul Bilgi University Law School, skillfully presents a critical analysis of the 2002 Black Sea Biodiversity and Landscape Conservation Protocol, developed in the framework of the 1992 Bucharest Convention on the Protection of the Black Sea against Pollution. Illustrating the particular geomorphology of the Black Sea and the anthropogenic factors of the decline of its biodiversity, she sheds light on the process of development this Protocol, its important characteristics, andย  its contextual interconnections at global and regional levels (UN Convention on Biological Diversity, relevant Mediterranean Protocols to the Barcelona Convention, European norms and strategies), while she underlines, pending its entry into force, the importance of a practical, declarative approach to its implementation through the adoption of a Strategic Action Plan.
Alexandros Kailis, a Ph. D. Candidate and a Researcher at the MEPIELAN Centre, offers an insightful presentation of the newly developed EU Maritime Strategy for the Atlantic Ocean that constitutes an implementation step towards the EU policy approach to integrated and context-relevant maritime governance. Elaborating on the main thematic areas of this Strategy, notably the challenges and opportunities posed by the Atlantic Ocean area, the necessary EU tools (financial, legal and political) for meeting them as well as on the importance of effectively engaging, apart from the EU institutions, a wide range of Atlantic stakeholders, he rightly underscores the potential impact of this Strategy on the establishment of an integrated governance framework for the Atlantic.
Stavrianna Kaisari, Researcher, eloquently provides a very critical and thought-provoking article on the Green Economy, one of the central themes of โ€œRio+20โ€, questioning its rationale for a new development paradigm and challenging the belief that it will generate a win-win solution for economy and the environment. She builds her argument on the inadequacies and inequities of the Green Economy model and its underlying โ€œnorthern way of thinkingโ€, based on the neo-liberal ideology, which produces overwhelming generalizations ignoring the importance of contextuality in evaluations and governance and perpetuating the โ€œrealityโ€ of unequal power relationship between North and South.
Finally, a Critical Forum Article byย Erifyli Paspati, a Ph.D Candidate at the Panteion University of Athens, usefully focus on the latest developments in Climate Change Negotiations, pointing to the complexity of the negotiating frames which led to the Durban negotiation process, assessesing the more constructive and the greyer areas of the outcomes of the Durban Platform, and arguing that the Durban Package has produced a credible outcome that may have aย  positive impact on the continuing climate change negotiations.

MEPIELAN E-Bulletinย is a dynamic electronic newsletter of MEPIELAN Centre, Panteion University of Athens, Greece.ย  It features guest articles, insights articles, critical forum textual contributions and reflections, specially selected documents and cases, book reviews as well as news on thematic topics of direct interest of MEPIELAN Centre, presented in a clear, insightful and attractive way whilst shedding light on topical issues of environmental law, governance and policy significance. Content bridges theory and practice perspectives of international law, international environmental law, sustainable development, and international negotiating process, and includes notifications of MEPIELAN cooperation updates and news. The Bulletin is an addition to our communication instruments which include an edited Series, theย MEPIELAN Studies in International Environmental Law and Negotiation.

It is hoped that its content will contribute to a scholarly debate on important issues of current interest, providing an independent, open access forum for the promotion of innovative ideas and enlightened critical views of distinguished authors. The Bulletin further aims at offering a knowledge- and information-sharing platform for MEPIELAN audience, striving to serve a modern thinking and questing community, in the hope that it will stimulate constructive discussions on the issues presented.ย  The audience includes academics, researchers, university students, international lawyers, officials and personnel of international organizations and institutional arrangements, heads and personnel of national authorities and administration at all levels (national, regional and local), members of Non-Governmental Organizations, as well as the relevant private sector.

My deepest appreciation goes to the authors of the expert articles and other contributions to this edition, to the members of the editorial team, and to our worldwide audience sharing with us the ideas and message of this Bulletin. Indeed, time reveals the importance of launching and sustaining a scholarly E-Bulletin in a time of utmost crisis.

About the author

Evangelos Raftopoulos
Editor and Founding Director of MEPIELAN Centre | [email protected] | Author's Website

Professor of International Law, Panteion University, Athens, Greece, Fellow, C-EENRG, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom

Related artifacts

Editorial
Participatory Environmental Governance: Reflecting on Its Innovative Legal and Political Underpinnings

Participatory Environmental Governance: Reflecting on Its Innovative Legal and Political Underpinnings

An Overview
Let me begin with a rather condensed articulation of the approach to Participatory Environmental Governance.
More than ever, and especially in this dire situation of the COVID-19 pandemic, โ€œparticipatory environmental governanceโ€ (PEG) should not be simply considered and declared as a challenging perspective or an abstract ambition to be โ€œmoderatelyโ€ planned, reached and practiced. In fact, its conceptualization and construction rises well beyond traditional โ€œnormalโ€ thinking and perceived applications or doctrinal positivist restrictions. It should be contemplated as a multidimensional, interdisciplinary, relational process capable of generating sustainability and contributing to common interest (international and domestic) in an โ€œever-changingโ€ world (โ€œmeeting the needs of present and future generationsโ€). Integrating political, legal, scientific and social knowledge, thus, effectively addressing the policy-science-society interface at all levels of governance PEG provides an all-encompassing approach to sustainability effectiveness while opening up a roadmap to trust and strong social legitimation.
Participatory environmental governance naturally ingrains a progressive bottom-up approach into the traditional top-down approach to the process of shaping and implementing environmental governance and law-making. As a result, sustainability policies and environmental legislation as well as international duty-obligations and power-rights under conventional environmental regimes, should come under public scrutiny. States should not only secure effective consultation with non-state actors, the public, in their decision-making process managing environmental issues. States should not merely give access to information to the public or disseminate scientific information on their own terms. Increasingly and consistently, States should effectively engage non-state actors, the public, in environmental decision-making process at all levels and in all stages of this process, so that the latter become essential part of the continuous management of sustainability with its ecological, technological, social and ethical implications. ฮคhe democratization and trust-building of this process, associated with consistent contribution to international/domestic common interest, is the best guarantee for its legitimation, effectiveness and social acceptance. In practice, this invites transformative innovative concepts and policies, public-engaging practices and better understanding of legal and political complementarities in constructing effective environmental governance.
Let me now take you to the streets of this so heavily rich โ€“ and so complex but reliable - encompassing approach to PEG, shedding some light into two of its, more daring but far-reaching, underpinnings to better understand its outward evolving institutional life.

Read more text

Editorial
Advocating a Public Trust Approach for the Sustainable Environmental Governance in the Mediterranean

Advocating a Public Trust Approach for the Sustainable Environmental Governance in the Mediterranean

As the work of MEPIELAN Centre continues apace in 2019, it is steadily involved in bringing forward innovative legal thinking and approaches into the international discussion of a recurring but painfully open question: how to improve implementation and compliance issues of environmental treaty regimes with a view to advancing their sustainability governance.

Read more text