Established in 2010

About MEPIELAN eBulletin

MEPIELAN E-Bulletin is a digital academic and practitioner newsletter of the MEPIELAN Centre, launched in 2010.ย  It features insight articles, reflective opinions, specially selected documents and cases, book reviews as well as news on thematic topics of direct interest of MEPIELAN Centre and on the activities and role of MEPIELAN Centre. Its content bridges theory and practice perspectives of relational international law, international environmental law and participatory governance , and international negotiating process, thus serving the primary goal of Centre: to develop an integrated, inter-disciplinary, relational, context-related and sustainably effective governance approach creating, protecting and advancing international common interest for the present and future generations. Providing a knowledge- and information-sharing platform and a scholarly forum, the Bulletin promotes innovative ideas and enlightened critical views, contributing to a broader scholarly debate on important issues of international common interest. The audience of the Bulletin includes academics, practitioners, researchers, university students, international lawyers, officials and personnel of international organizations and institutional arrangements, heads and personnel of national authorities at all levels (national, regional and local), and members of the civil society at large.

Editorial

Editorial Nov 2012

November 1, 2012

Written by

Evangelos Raftopoulos

Welcome to the 2012 fall edition of MEPIELAN E-Bulletin.

My gratitude and thanks go to all those who have been instrumental in the continuing success of this Bulletin. According to the latest figures, there have been over 10.500 visits to the Bulletinโ€™s website from 143 countries worldwide.

The vision of the Bulletin to provide a dynamic scholarly forum for inter-disciplinary knowledge and discussion and advocate the need to understand environmental governance, its law and policy aspects, in terms of establishing, protecting and promoting international common interest, is realized through the invaluable engagement of distinguished academic experts and scholars as well as of promising young researchers. This edition features several new articles discussing innovative ideas and hotly debated issues of international law and policy, environment and development. While continuing the unending flow of topical thematic news, this edition also presents a new international case of interest, the Yasuni Park Trust Fund as an innovative global experiment reflecting environmental trust governance contributing to sustainability. Moreover, this edition, serving as a showcase for new knowledge-advancing books, presents a new important book โ€œGlobal Environmental Governance Reconsideredโ€, an excellent collection edited by Frank Biermann and Philipp Pattberg, which contains insightful articles providing theoretical underpinnings and perspectives of global environmental governance as perceived and researched in the framework of the well-known Clobal Environmental Governance Project.

A Guest Article written byย Philipp Pattberg, Associate Professor of Transnational Governance, Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands, eloquently takes an insightful and well-balanced view on the outcome of the Rio+20 Summit, highlighting the weaknesses reflected in the official summit declaration โ€œThe Future We Wantโ€ โ€“ evidently defeating the widespread expectations for achieving โ€œa transformative shiftโ€ in international environmental governance โ€“ but also denoting its few positive results. As he rightly concludes, โ€œwhile we certainly should search for additional approaches to global environmental governance beyond mega-conferences, what is most needed now is a critical reflection on how the summit results can be used to revive global sustainability governance.โ€

Two Insight Articles also feature this edition:

In an article entitled โ€œThe Barcelona Convention System as an International Trust Regime: The Public Participation Aspectโ€ I resurface my older argument โ€“ based on the public trust approach and enriched with new theoritical perspectives โ€“ that the Barcelona Convention and its seven Protocols, along with all regional or global conventional environmental regimes (improperly labeled as โ€œMultilateral Environmental Agreementsโ€ โ€“ MEAs), should be viewed as conventionally determined international trust regimes. After explaining the fiduciary legal language and structure of trust environmental governance in the Barcelona Convention System, the argument is focused on the public participation aspect, exploring the issues and challenges for the public-as-beneficiaries or inter-generational beneficiaries underlining the relational impact of the Aarhus Convention.

Dr. Elli Louka, Founder of Alphabetics Development & Investment (ADI), USA, meticulously and critically examines the complex system of conventional regimes governing the safety and security of nuclear materials, offering a well-balanced and concise presentation of the evolution of nuclear governance of such intricate and crucial issues as nuclear safety, physical protection of nuclear material, safety of irradiated nuclear fuel cargo and liability for nuclear accidents.

Finally, a Critical Forum Article byย Socrates Zachos, a Ph.D Candidate and Researcher at MEPIELAN Centre, usefully unfolds the complex pattern of Local Authorities participation in the Rio+20 process, presenting their contribution to the two main themes of the Conference (green economy and institutional reform), as well as to the negotiating process of the Zero Draft of the Outcome Document, and he highlights their assessment of the achievements, failures and perspectives of the outcome of Rio+20.

MEPIELAN E-Bulletinย is a dynamic electronic newsletter of MEPIELAN Centre, Panteion University of Athens, Greece.ย  It features guest articles, insights articles, critical forum textual contributions and reflections, specially selected documents and cases, book reviews as well as news on thematic topics of direct interest of MEPIELAN Centre, presented in a clear, insightful and attractive way whilst shedding light on topical issues of environmental law, governance and policy significance. Content bridges theory and practice perspectives of international law, international environmental law, sustainable development, and international negotiating process, and includes notifications of MEPIELAN cooperation updates and news. The Bulletin is an addition to our communication instruments which include an edited Series, theย MEPIELAN Studies in International Environmental Law and Negotiation.

It is hoped that its content will contribute to a scholarly debate on important issues of current interest, providing an independent, open access forum for the promotion of innovative ideas and enlightened critical views of distinguished authors. The Bulletin further aims at offering a knowledge- and information-sharing platform for MEPIELAN audience, striving to serve a modern thinking and questing community, in the hope that it will stimulate constructive discussions on the issues presented.ย  The audience includes academics, researchers, university students, international lawyers, officials and personnel of international organizations and institutional arrangements, heads and personnel of national authorities and administration at all levels (national, regional and local), members of Non-Governmental Organizations, as well as the relevant private sector.

In a time of utmost crisis, in an epoch where we come to realize that the boldest measures are the safest, words fail to express my deepest appreciation to all the contributors to this edition and to our faithful worldwide audience sharing with us the progressing ideas, knowledge and message of this Bulletin.

About the author

Evangelos Raftopoulos
Editor and Founding Director of MEPIELAN Centre | [email protected] | Author's Website

Professor of International Law, Panteion University, Athens, Greece, Fellow, C-EENRG, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom

Related artifacts

Editorial
Participatory Environmental Governance: Reflecting on Its Innovative Legal and Political Underpinnings

Participatory Environmental Governance: Reflecting on Its Innovative Legal and Political Underpinnings

An Overview
Let me begin with a rather condensed articulation of the approach to Participatory Environmental Governance.
More than ever, and especially in this dire situation of the COVID-19 pandemic, โ€œparticipatory environmental governanceโ€ (PEG) should not be simply considered and declared as a challenging perspective or an abstract ambition to be โ€œmoderatelyโ€ planned, reached and practiced. In fact, its conceptualization and construction rises well beyond traditional โ€œnormalโ€ thinking and perceived applications or doctrinal positivist restrictions. It should be contemplated as a multidimensional, interdisciplinary, relational process capable of generating sustainability and contributing to common interest (international and domestic) in an โ€œever-changingโ€ world (โ€œmeeting the needs of present and future generationsโ€). Integrating political, legal, scientific and social knowledge, thus, effectively addressing the policy-science-society interface at all levels of governance PEG provides an all-encompassing approach to sustainability effectiveness while opening up a roadmap to trust and strong social legitimation.
Participatory environmental governance naturally ingrains a progressive bottom-up approach into the traditional top-down approach to the process of shaping and implementing environmental governance and law-making. As a result, sustainability policies and environmental legislation as well as international duty-obligations and power-rights under conventional environmental regimes, should come under public scrutiny. States should not only secure effective consultation with non-state actors, the public, in their decision-making process managing environmental issues. States should not merely give access to information to the public or disseminate scientific information on their own terms. Increasingly and consistently, States should effectively engage non-state actors, the public, in environmental decision-making process at all levels and in all stages of this process, so that the latter become essential part of the continuous management of sustainability with its ecological, technological, social and ethical implications. ฮคhe democratization and trust-building of this process, associated with consistent contribution to international/domestic common interest, is the best guarantee for its legitimation, effectiveness and social acceptance. In practice, this invites transformative innovative concepts and policies, public-engaging practices and better understanding of legal and political complementarities in constructing effective environmental governance.
Let me now take you to the streets of this so heavily rich โ€“ and so complex but reliable - encompassing approach to PEG, shedding some light into two of its, more daring but far-reaching, underpinnings to better understand its outward evolving institutional life.

Read more text

Evangelos Raftopoulos | Nov 8, 2020 | 14 min read

Editorial
Advocating a Public Trust Approach for the Sustainable Environmental Governance in the Mediterranean

Advocating a Public Trust Approach for the Sustainable Environmental Governance in the Mediterranean

As the work of MEPIELAN Centre continues apace in 2019, it is steadily involved in bringing forward innovative legal thinking and approaches into the international discussion of a recurring but painfully open question: how to improve implementation and compliance issues of environmental treaty regimes with a view to advancing their sustainability governance.

Read more text

Evangelos Raftopoulos | Feb 28, 2019 | 7 min read